Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button
Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login
Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Relational, Not 'Relatitional'....sorry (repeat Previous Post )

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Whittier on July 20, 2002 21:45:53 UTC

If Dr. Dick agrees that Relative time can be very useful, and agrees the only thing absolute about relative time and clocks is that they are Absolutely (ie. ONLY) Relational to the frames of reference in which they are employed,
then what's the fuss about? Does Dr. Stafford agree to all that? If not, why not?

Sincerely,
Mike Pearson

Follow Ups:

    Login to Post
    Additional Information
    Google
     
    Web www.astronomy.net
    DayNightLine
    About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
    Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
    Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
    "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
    are trademarks of John Huggins