You Are Obligated By Your Brashness To Reply Competently - an Astronomy Net God & Science Forum Message

God & Science Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| God and Science \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

You Are Obligated By Your Brashness To Reply Competently

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Michael W. Pearson on July 18, 2002 23:16:17 UTC

Hi, Bruce,
Perhaps Dr. Dick is wrong on some points.
Perhaps his tone, though mild compared to
popular talk radio, is not quite the cautious
scientific tone we prefer.
Yet, if the standard applies to him, it applies to you also.
You said you would reply to me on absolute vs. relative time.
It's been two months now. Are you reserving your reply for later?
http://www.astronomy.net/forums/god/messages/19080.shtml
If you think mathematical physics cannot be wellsummarized with prose, then I must be clueless,
because I think it can...as do several Nobel Prize winners.

Warm regards,
Mike

Follow Ups:

? - bruce - July 19, 2002 - 01:56 UTC
- Well, I don't know why you took it out on me. - carefuluniverse - July 19, 2002 - 03:15 UTC
- Neither am I...except you are beginning to seem case # 1 of that - carefuluniverse - July 20, 2002 - 05:38 UTC
  - Just kidding with that title....I must be more careful - carefuluniverse - July 20, 2002 - 19:59 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins