Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
You Are Obligated By Your Brashness To Reply Competently

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Michael W. Pearson on July 18, 2002 23:16:17 UTC

Hi, Bruce,
Perhaps Dr. Dick is wrong on some points.
Perhaps his tone, though mild compared to
popular talk radio, is not quite the cautious
scientific tone we prefer.
Yet, if the standard applies to him, it applies to you also.
You said you would reply to me on absolute vs. relative time.
It's been two months now. Are you reserving your reply for later?
If you think mathematical physics cannot be wellsummarized with prose, then I must be clueless,
because I think it do several Nobel Prize winners.

Warm regards,

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2018 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins