Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Wise Words Often Fall On Deaf Ears

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Aurino Souza on July 9, 2002 14:11:22 UTC


I appreciate your efforts trying to explain physics to us mere mortals, but all I get from any explanation of QM is confusion. I can probably blame that on my lack of expertise on the subject.

Back to my first post, what I really meant was that any explanation of consciousness based on QM will not make sense to people who know much about one subject and little about the other. I have never, ever heard of anyone who's knowledgeable in both fields, and that's the only reason I think a QM-based model for consciousness is doomed to fail. I happen to think Dick's paper is one such model, a very good one as far as my understanding goes, but it failed nonetheless.

It's really an imbroglio as far as I can tell. We are in desperate need of an Einstein.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins