Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Not Under The Carpet

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Luis Hamburgh on July 9, 2002 12:40:18 UTC

>>>"why (do) wave functions collapse when no one is looking(?)"

Some of the very first (and I think, crudest) interpretations of QM require observation in order for a collapse to occur, and many interpretations assume wave collapse must occur in order for things to actually exist. But (1) most interpretations have worked the first problem out, and (2) in my opinion it's questionable to presume -- from our inability to perceive without this collapse -- the notion that reality is composed of "streams" of these collapsing functions. The presumption in (2) stems from an attitude that our sensations are, at least to some extent, independent of reality.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2021 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins