I don't need to read those articles, mainly because they ignore the issues of how their is no physical evidence of a flood. You have ignored those questions I raised and continue to post more links from a group that is known for its lies.

YEC are huge in taking small things and trying to blow them out of proportion. If I wanted to, I could blitz you with thousands of pro-glacier websites. The evidence around us for an old-earth is overwhelming. I given you just a bit of that evidence, yet you just post more links. Until you maturely deal with what I've given you first, there is no reason to continue, mainly because that would indicate you having no willingness to actually discuss science.

And no, "I believe I have a reasonable grasp of what is happening, and I am trying to learn more."

No you don't! Any person who believes in the global flood doesn't. You know nothing of geology. You can't even find websites that do.

• Ok. - kc2gwx - June 29, 2002 - 14:38 UTC
  • So powerful are those links... - richard - June 29, 2002 - 18:18 UTC
    • ...that you ignore them again. - kc2gwx - June 30, 2002 - 23:32 UTC
      • Wait a second. - richard - July 1, 2002 - 03:22 UTC