Okay but evolutionists are often wrong in how they apply evolution to modern life and human society and wind up with the widest range of
psychobabbling recipes for doom.
From them, along with good stuff from evolution-comprehending guys like myself, we get the bad stuff too, such as
"the most ruthless will triumph and their DNA will rule!"
"Oh, those species deserve to die if they can't cut it."
"Change is inevitable, so let's drive drunk the ship of state!"

From bees and ants we get prescriptions from evolutionists for human society. I've seen it numerous times...
not complaining about E.O. Wilson or sociobiology as science...
YEC and ICR might be devious in some cases...yet
from the threat of misapplied evolutionary theory,
they protect their religous social theories with further inquiry...they're nob ready to buy into evolution's social implications as prescribed by socio-entomlogists (apologies to wonderful insect scientists)

• Michael, I don't think many scientists... - richard - June 5, 2002 - 22:44 UTC
  • My Name is Mr. Pearson and if you're a scientist... - carefuluniverse - June 6, 2002 - 16:08 UTC
    • Mr. Pearson - richard - June 6, 2002 - 16:26 UTC
      • Mr. Anonymous - carefuluniverse - June 6, 2002 - 16:56 UTC
        • Do Not Feed The Troll (nt) - harvey1 - June 6, 2002 - 17:03 UTC
          • who's a troll? - carefuluniverse - June 6, 2002 - 17:32 UTC
          • Oh, thanks, Harv, for that - carefuluniverse - June 6, 2002 - 17:34 UTC