Me: ***"That is, amphibians will not appear before fishes, nor mammals before reptiles, and no complex life will occur in the geological record before the oldest eucaryotic cells. This prediction has been upheld by the evidence that has accumulated until now: no reversals have been found." This is a blantant lie. Brain-washing to kids who read this! Fish have been found in the Cambrian, humans next to their 'ancestors', polystrates, and many other examples of this. I find it hard to believe that they were not aware of this evidence when they wrote the article.**

You "All of these supposed-inconsistencies from creationist are easily debunked. For example, the supposed 'human' footprint next to a dinosaur footprint shows a trailing digit indentation in the ground behind the footprint. Obviously not a human footprint afterall."

You say all the inconsistencies are easily debunbked, but you don't deal with a single one I used!!!! You use one about a footprint, which I said nothing about. How about refuting my evidence?

"Well, you could start by not stopping debate when you are clearly wrong. My suggestion is to carry forward to the point to where you see yourself contradicting yourself (even by your own measure) and then you will see how foolish it is to remain a young-earth creationist."

I am not clearly wrong. When I contrdict myself, go ahead and gloat. It won't happen. KC2GWX 73's

• Cite the scientific paper - harvey1 - June 6, 2002 - 01:49 UTC
  • Debunk paper. - emperor__alikar - June 6, 2002 - 03:32 UTC
    • Sure - harvey1 - June 6, 2002 - 04:28 UTC
      • Thank you - emperor__alikar - June 6, 2002 - 15:08 UTC
        • Try here - harvey1 - June 6, 2002 - 16:30 UTC