Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Argh...... Argh..... Argh Argh Argh....... Argh. Argh.

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Mario Dovalina on June 4, 2002 23:22:46 UTC

I said: "Wouldn't it make more sense for an intelligent designer to set the universe it motion and let it all pan out, rather than going through leaps and bounds to give the universe the appearance of age?"

You said: "Not if he wanted a universe that couldn't be explained with out him.

You consider evidence which seems to contradict your views to be proof of God? You consider jumping through hoops to present the Bible as a credible source of truth using pseudoscience to be the only way to explain the existence of God? Argh.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2018 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins