"You are correct to suggest that the only one that makes sense is that god started the world 6,000 years ago in an instant with light already on its way to us. However, that is a religious belief and not valid science. To be valid science it has to be fallsifiable and there is no way to determine scientifically if it happened or not."

Aren't you the one who said that you believe God started the universe, and you are not sure how? That is a religious belief and not valid science. To be valid science it has to be fallsifiable and there is no way to determine scientifically if it happened or not. Therfore your belief is a religion, not a science. According to you, anyway.

So, our both our theories religion, or are neither? KC2GWX 73's

• Right()nt) - yanniru - June 4, 2002 - 01:03 UTC