Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Scott Abernathy on May 31, 2002 16:53:13 UTC

"Thank you for speaking for the entire professional world."

You are quite welcome.

Thank you for speaking for the entire scientific community.

You are quite welcome. I didn't mean to steal your thunder. I know it is your job to speak for the entire scientific community when you say that evolution will be destroyed in 50-75 years.

"Do you think there is another alternative to evolution than creation?"

I don't think creationism is scientific at its foundation. It presumes their is a creator!! That is outside the realm of science. They may have arguments that there was a worldwide flood, and they may be able to poke holes in the dating techniques, but they can never prove the existence of a creator. So their foundation assumuption makes their logic invalid.

Right now evolution explains the evidence we have found. The evidence supports the theory, as of now. When new evidence comes to light and changes the theory, so will I. Right now there is no better explanation out there, at least none that can be supported by the evidences accumulated.


Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins