***According to the person who interprets the scriptures, either he is right and the other view is wrong, or it is the opposite. That's what I meant.***

By using the qualification, "according to the person", you are talking about the opinion of that person. So what you are saying is that you may each have the opinion that you are right and the other guy is wrong, and that seems to be the case.

But those opinions are a completely different matter from the question of which, or whether either, of you is right in the sense that your opinions reflect reality. The possibility still exists that both of your interpretations are wrong.

Warm regards,

Paul

• Good to see you still posting - harvey1 - May 30, 2002 - 22:34 UTC
  • Thanks - pmartin - May 31, 2002 - 16:00 UTC
    • asimov's character on spacecraft was often the psychologist - carefuluniverse - June 1, 2002 - 00:48 UTC
      • Your message blew right past me - pmartin - June 1, 2002 - 05:30 UTC
        • me too - carefuluniverse - June 1, 2002 - 21:40 UTC
• Hi Paul - darwinpoodle - May 30, 2002 - 22:54 UTC
  • Hi Scott - pmartin - May 31, 2002 - 16:02 UTC
• I knew you couldn't stay gone forever - stormcrow - May 31, 2002 - 00:25 UTC
  • I knew you knew that - pmartin - May 31, 2002 - 16:03 UTC
    • ida said that if I thought it would help - carefuluniverse - May 31, 2002 - 17:26 UTC