Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Re: Fact

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Harvey on May 29, 2002 00:46:06 UTC


***Fact : An event, action, or bit of knowledge that can not be disputed by another current event, action, or bit of knowledge. If it is disputed by a current event, action, or bit of knowledge then it is no longer a fact.***

So, what do you think of this link: ?

***Bit of knowledge: A piece of knowledge that has been determined to be true even if there still remains unknown properities to that truth.***

Just unknown properties? What about the existence of mild discrepancies? I get the impression that you think mild discrepancies should be non-existent in order to consider a theory to be true. If that's the case, then we should reject the notion that the sun operates on fusion. Mild discrepancies in our models of the sun still exist.

Warm regards, Harv

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2022 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins