Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Hmm....

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Aaron Viviano on May 27, 2002 23:49:45 UTC

"Science cannot be a religion"

Yep. That however doesn't mean that a religion can't be scienticly correct.

"In the realm of scientific study, there are many facts. 'Maple trees need more water than Pines' is a fact. 'The sun burns light skin more severely than dark skin' is a fact... and so forth.

In this sense, evolution is a fact."

What? No! MACRO EVOLUTION has never been observed. Micro Evolution has. A fact is something that can be obeverably true.

That is what I beleive.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2018 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins