I won't get angry at you as long as you keep it scientifical. Richard is blabing about how I have
no evidence, yet I think you will agree I try to keep it as scientific as possible. You may not agree with what I say, as me with you, but it doesn't mean we are not being scientific. By the way, here is my response to the transitional fossils you gave as evidnece: http://www.astronomy.net/forums/god/messages/17443.shtml

I hope you have a difficult time responding to that! Just kidding. (Kinda) Anyway, 73's (If you
don't know what that is, in ham radio speak it means bye. And have a nice day.)