Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Not So

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Harvey on May 14, 2002 04:51:26 UTC


How do you arrive at atheism meaning a lack of a belief? The privative forms a new word to the root. The -ism is always applied to the new word. To make it clear:

1) Greek 'theo' means God.
2) 'a'- 'without' or 'no' or 'denial of'
3) add 'a' + 'theo'
4) 'a-theo' means 'without God existing' or 'no God existing' or 'denial of God existing' or 'God is lacking from existing'
5) '-ism' means 'belief in' or 'belief of'
6) 'atheism' means belief of 'no God existing', or belief in 'God is lacking from existing', or belief in 'God is without existence', or belief of a 'denial in God's existence'.

Hence, the proper grammatical definition of atheism is a denial of the existence of God. This is the historical meaning. In fact, Bertrand Russell, Thomas Huxley, et al. wrote about the reasons why they didn't feel comfortable making a statement about God's non-existence, but rather thought a middle position of not knowing (or agnostic) was more preferable.

Warm Regards, Harv

Follow Ups:

    Login to Post
    Additional Information
    About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
    Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2023 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
    Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
    "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
    are trademarks of John Huggins