God & Science Forum Message | |
| Forums: |
Atm ·
Astrophotography ·
Blackholes ·
Blackholes2 ·
CCD ·
Celestron ·
Domes ·
Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place... The Space and Astronomy Agora |
| Science Has Already Solved Dick's Problem
Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To Posted by Richard Ruquist on May 13, 2002 15:56:04 UTC |
Read Hall's paper in one of the April issues of the Journal of Physics A. He starts from classical mechanics and Fisher information based on pollester mathematics and derives both Schroedinger's equation and an exact form of the uncertainty principle. What that says to me is that Dick has simply derived another version of a data sampling theory. Everything Dick purports to be fundamental is by analogy as the form of what he derived is the same as some well known equations in physics. Having the same form does not prove anything.
|
|
| Additional Information |
|---|
 |
| About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy |
|
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post. "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET" are trademarks of John Huggins |