Hi Ian,

Ian:

"There is no evidence that states that any of them have a more valid argument than any other that their religion is the "true" religion of the world."

Response:
In science we would have to define " "true" religion of the world "
before evaluating your statement.
We would need criteria. Do you have such criteria?
We can neither confirm NOR DENY a matter scientifically except by following such careful
processes.


Ian:

"but the huge amount of data that scientists in all fields have found point in the completely opposite direction of a literal bible."

Most of the Bible is more historical and about personal psychology or sociology than about physical, chemical or biological science in its claims.
The "completely opposite direction" in two dimensions is 180 degress opposite. In matters of
life's meaning and conduct, what does "completely opposite dirction" describe?

Hi again,
Mike

• What is "is" - darguuth - May 9, 2002 - 04:18 UTC
  • dork off - quiet - May 9, 2002 - 05:16 UTC