Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
In Other Frames Of Reference

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by M.W.Pearson on May 8, 2002 19:04:52 UTC

Hi Ian,

Ian:

"There is no evidence that states that any of them have a more valid argument than any other that their religion is the "true" religion of the world."

Response:
In science we would have to define " "true" religion of the world "
before evaluating your statement.
We would need criteria. Do you have such criteria?
We can neither confirm NOR DENY a matter scientifically except by following such careful
processes.


Ian:

"but the huge amount of data that scientists in all fields have found point in the completely opposite direction of a literal bible."

Most of the Bible is more historical and about personal psychology or sociology than about physical, chemical or biological science in its claims.
The "completely opposite direction" in two dimensions is 180 degress opposite. In matters of
life's meaning and conduct, what does "completely opposite dirction" describe?

Hi again,
Mike

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2019 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins