Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Unfortunately

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Harvey on May 7, 2002 14:05:29 UTC

Aurino,

I think the problem is that in your posts it is always you that become the ultimate deciding factor in what is the correct position. On the other hand, my approach is always to test the position itself and use whatever research is out there on the subject to discuss those positions in that light. This is why, I suspect, we usually see that you give up on the discussion (always prematurely I might add). Since holding a particular position is solely dependent on what you think, you find that your position is the 'end all of be all'. It's not physicists that are right, it is Aurino that is right. It's not philosophers that are right, it is Aurino that is right. It's not Harv that is right, it is Aurino that is right. I have admitted on numerous occasions at being wrong, but I cannot think of a time that you did so. In my view, you do not really care about the issues in question, you just like citing your opinion and being right.

You might ponder on that. But, we know you won't.

Warm regards, Harv

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2022 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins