Yes, It Is. - an Astronomy Net God & Science Forum Message

God & Science Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| God and Science \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Yes, It Is.

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Luis Hamburgh on May 4, 2002 19:02:09 UTC

>>>"It's not fun being the one to refute a life's work."

It is when you get someone so stubborn, evasive, and obtuse as Stafford. Besides, I seriously doubt any of you physics PhDs in here are the first to debunk his mess.

>>>"You pulled a switch on us from taking gradients of the values of your data points to taking gradients in space."

Alex seemed to say something similar. Indeed, I'd be surprised to find one physics PhD who'd agree Stafford is onto something.

Follow Ups:

sorry Luis...rhetoric can't substitute 4 technical summation - something - May 4, 2002 - 20:22 UTC
- Toning down the "fluff." - luis_hamburgh - May 10, 2002 - 00:38 UTC
  - A commendable objective - pmartin - May 10, 2002 - 16:43 UTC
    - Stick to the math -- your ulterior motives are showing! - luis_hamburgh - May 11, 2002 - 18:02 UTC
      - You are right, Luis - pmartin - May 12, 2002 - 00:16 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2025 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins