Scott Changed Definition Of Who He Is - an Astronomy Net God & Science Forum Message

God & Science Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| God and Science \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Scott Changed Definition Of Who He Is

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Richard Ruquist on April 26, 2002 13:43:33 UTC

In the original post you (Scott) were 'I am' but in the above post you are 'I am the one responding'. When you change definitions you also change conclusions. I agree that your logic works if you are the second definition.

But it seems that in the original post you made the 'hidden' assumption that you were defined by responding. That is not a normal definition of a person. It's like you do not exist if you are not asked a question.

We have to be careful not to make hidden, or unconscious assumptions. I see alot of that going on in this forum.

Regards,

Richard

Follow Ups:

Everyone should realize I am not the only one here - carefuluniverse - April 26, 2002 - 15:41 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins