Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Scott Changed Definition Of Who He Is

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Richard Ruquist on April 26, 2002 13:43:33 UTC

In the original post you (Scott) were 'I am' but in the above post you are 'I am the one responding'. When you change definitions you also change conclusions. I agree that your logic works if you are the second definition.

But it seems that in the original post you made the 'hidden' assumption that you were defined by responding. That is not a normal definition of a person. It's like you do not exist if you are not asked a question.

We have to be careful not to make hidden, or unconscious assumptions. I see alot of that going on in this forum.



Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2022 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins