No Matter How Minutely We Quantify Analog, It Is Still Analog - an Astronomy Net God & Science Forum Message

God & Science Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| God and Science \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

No Matter How Minutely We Quantify Analog, It Is Still Analog

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Luis Hamburgh on April 24, 2002 04:07:10 UTC

Yes Paul,

I have read his work. Dirac functions are derived from reductionist math. The continuous math Dicky doo uses is to reality what digital technology is to sound. We can replicate just about anything by quantifying it, but when we confuse our duplication for the item itself, we have placed the cart before the horse.

The fact is, we have no inherently holistic/fluid mathematical system. And I do not think we can get there with a series reductionist steps.

The only thing Dick has accomplished is a glorified version of Zeon's Paradox.

-LH

Follow Ups:

:) - luis_hamburgh - April 24, 2002 - 04:08 UTC
Start trying harder to look nonchalant ! - carefuluniverse - April 24, 2002 - 04:46 UTC
- Yes, I am - luis_hamburgh - April 27, 2002 - 20:31 UTC
  - question was.... - spazcon - April 28, 2002 - 20:43 UTC
    - Pblththtppbbtlh - luis_hamburgh - May 4, 2002 - 18:32 UTC
Interesting, Luis - dolphin - April 26, 2002 - 22:39 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins