Mike - you are so.... deep. Did you let my comments absorb into your mind over a long period of time or did you "hastily contrive" them in 5 minutes or less. Maybe I was just trying to get a rise out of them or maybe that is my pure philosophical stance regarding this forum. Either way I don't think your dime store analysis of my comments is as well thought out as you would like to think. Why was my comment inauthentic? I made a jab and instead of entering my game of slanderous comments they let it slide and gave me a dignified response. It seems it is you, who with all the maturity of a 12 year old in middle school, that is slinging mud with statements like "cult following". That was the type of malice and venom I was looking for in my initial comments. Enough of that...how 'bout a thought o' the day! Riveting...powerful...explosive...full of Language Removed!!!

Time at a black hole is warped infinitely relative to an observer here on earth, and as someone entered the black hole there image would be infinitely redshifted and appear as a "frozen" image... then what would the person entering the black hole see as they looked back out into space? (what a run-on!) Would they see time infinitely speeding up to the point where the past, present, and future were happening at once? If so would they see the universe as God sees it, if such a fairytale figure exists? Would it be like observing the universe from outside the universe with all the privledges of hindsight? How deep of me!!

cynically yours - Scott

• I would reply even though Medusa has many Mikeys - carefuluniverse - April 10, 2002 - 02:03 UTC
  • Congrats Mike... - aurino - April 10, 2002 - 13:02 UTC
    • ouch... that really hurts - darwinpoodle - April 10, 2002 - 14:46 UTC
      • Don't be offended - harvey1 - April 10, 2002 - 15:08 UTC
        • It's true - carefuluniverse - April 10, 2002 - 17:03 UTC
          • Finally the truth comes out - darwinpoodle - April 10, 2002 - 18:22 UTC
            • Sure - harvey1 - April 10, 2002 - 19:38 UTC
            • I think this is not science but do you baptize your ancestors? - carefuluniverse - April 10, 2002 - 19:45 UTC
      • Wait Wait - darwinpoodle - April 10, 2002 - 15:19 UTC
        • Don't worry about it - harvey1 - April 10, 2002 - 15:34 UTC
    • Causticity-- what it means - carefuluniverse - April 10, 2002 - 17:26 UTC
      • whew...once again that is deep stuff - darwinpoodle - April 10, 2002 - 19:41 UTC
        • this passion of yours bespeaks of familiarity - carefuluniverse - April 10, 2002 - 19:47 UTC
          • What do I have to hide? - darwinpoodle - April 10, 2002 - 20:04 UTC
            • Well, Scott, here's what I told Harv - carefuluniverse - April 10, 2002 - 20:12 UTC
              • I'm a jerk, I'm a jerk!!! This will not stand - darwinpoodle - April 10, 2002 - 22:32 UTC
        • regarding integrity and Scott's refusal to cite references - carefuluniverse - April 10, 2002 - 20:11 UTC
    • Thanks Aurino - carefuluniverse - April 11, 2002 - 05:13 UTC
      • No problem - aurino - April 11, 2002 - 13:07 UTC
        • Are you speaking of little old me - darwinpoodle - April 11, 2002 - 14:22 UTC
          • Your answers - aurino - April 11, 2002 - 15:17 UTC
            • Excellent... - darwinpoodle - April 11, 2002 - 15:47 UTC
              • Try harder - aurino - April 11, 2002 - 16:53 UTC
                • O.K. sir, whatever you say sir - darwinpoodle - April 11, 2002 - 20:08 UTC
                  • subtle accuracy, not force and weight - carefuluniverse - April 11, 2002 - 21:23 UTC
              • Is this trash really necessary? - doctordick - April 11, 2002 - 19:21 UTC
                • Have fun!! yippy skippy and howdy doody - darwinpoodle - April 11, 2002 - 19:36 UTC
                • I think Aurino enjoyed it (nt) - harvey1 - April 11, 2002 - 19:55 UTC
                  • No Harv, you're wrong again - aurino - April 11, 2002 - 23:14 UTC
                • It's useless - aurino - April 11, 2002 - 23:12 UTC
                  • But THIS is useful...being a rating of blather blather blather - carefuluniverse - April 12, 2002 - 00:50 UTC
                    • REPOST being A Rating Of Blather Blather Blather - carefuluniverse - April 12, 2002 - 00:56 UTC
                      • I need a title - carefuluniverse - April 12, 2002 - 01:07 UTC
                        • better yet - carefuluniverse - April 12, 2002 - 01:09 UTC
                          • best so far - carefuluniverse - April 12, 2002 - 01:11 UTC
                          • best so far - carefuluniverse - April 12, 2002 - 01:11 UTC
                            • okay, that's all for now - carefuluniverse - April 12, 2002 - 01:13 UTC
                              • Honestly - darwinpoodle - April 12, 2002 - 04:06 UTC
                                • forget it - carefuluniverse - April 12, 2002 - 06:19 UTC
                                  • Correction - darwinpoodle - April 12, 2002 - 12:22 UTC
                                • Thank you! - doctordick - April 12, 2002 - 14:27 UTC
                                • To Scott - yanniru - April 12, 2002 - 15:45 UTC
                                  • To a fine Man and Mind, Yanniru, I guess - spazcon - April 16, 2002 - 02:38 UTC