In a way Aurino has a point; about me not saying anything when I say "this" is "that". They are different labels for the same thing. But they may tell you something about a correspondence between two things that people might have thought were not the same. So it tells you something.

Also when I say "this" is related to "that", I'm saying something there; something about relationships.
Back at Counterbalance Harv had a long debate with me once and we both ended up agreeing that relationships exist.

Jesus Christ said (of Himself) "I am the Way, the Truth, and the Light".

Harv makes a point about the problem of "description". The answer is that ultimately things just ARE. And relationships just ARE.

The serious answer then is for someone to just BE; you would see the answer just by seeing them.
No description needed.

No word-doubling-up needed then!
Maybe you have a clue now what infant-infant telepathy is like; no words, just direct awareness of existent phenomena created by Existence.

Short of time, so this may look like rushed ideas.

-dolphin