Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
In A Nutshell

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Alan on April 2, 2002 09:17:11 UTC

Hi Aurino,

I'm certainly no Dick-worshipper, as no doubt you realise.

I thought it was a cool idea, the idea that physics was circular. That the laws of physics reduce to the law of non-contradiction. That tallies with the idea of maximum freedom, minimum constraint. That all things come from Existence.

I sensed early on that Dick's ideas were covered by my more general "pattern-matching" ideas. His explanations of his ideas allowed me to understand enough to see what game he was playing. It seems to make sense; but I think he is excessively narrow in his approach; that he makes unnecessary and exaggerated philosophical claims!

I am grateful to him for adding fuel to the fire of my own idea-discoveries. I think the essence of his paper can be done in a much simpler and more direct way.

I am intereseted in what is true, whether Dick or anyone else finds something that looks true doesn't matter compared to what it is they find.

-dolphin

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2018 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins