Happy Halloween

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
The Argument About What Is Already Known

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Richard Ruquist on February 25, 2002 15:06:46 UTC

can be refuted.

Let's agree that QED and GR are already known.

Then consider the EPR paradox that Einstein invented with the aid of Rosen and Padolsky to prove that Quantum Mechanics was wrong.

When the experiment was finally done, first by Aspect of France and then repeated by many others with different particles, it turned out that GR was wrong. Something was traveling faster than light in this experiment.

So here is a known theory that was refuted in special circumstances. That would seem to refute your views:



BTW, GR does not fall out of Staffords work. Only QM does.

In addition, there is no circularity in experiments.

In addition, Staffords results come from the symmetries he defined.

It is true that in any system of logic or mathematics, the theorems or solutions depend on the assumptions. You make different assumptions and you will get different results. That is not circularity- that's logic. However, in any system more complex than plane geometry, there are emergent solutions that are true that cannot be derived from the assumptions. Change the assumptions and you will get different emergent solutions, but they still cannot be derived from the assumptions. That is what Goedel started and now it has become a field of study.

So emergent solutions are examples that are not circular even in the sense that you use the word.

Regards,

Richard

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2020 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins