More of the same from you. Just for fun:
***If your conversation is only with Mario, then exchanging email is a way to avoid criticism from your far-better qualified co-posters on this list.***
Others can jump in freely. But, I would ask that they reply in the correct context and seek to clarify the meaning of the writer before they make unfounded insinuations (like you).
***I have never seen logic as bad as yours that was not eventually revealed as a case of bad-faith communication. every point you made seems to be in hope that nobody will have a copy of the original post or bother to look back.***
(Yawn) More argumentum ad hominem. Unfortunately it is not the only logical fallacy you are guilty of making.
***I already cited your statements verbatim: the statement you maee is almost identical to the statement you deny making, in case after case.***
You simply do not understand the differences in context and meaning. I'm sorry, but I cannot help you there. But, if you ever want clarification as to the meaning, you know where to ask rather than mindlessly insinuate with ad hominem arguments as your support.
***Rewriting history is more evidence you are from another kind of warm place. Your spelling and grammar are good, and the rest is mostly mush. Bad faith mush, I suggest. That's the last time I will respond to you with anything but to tag you as an unreliable source and refer to your previous prevarications -- at least 'til you grow up***
It seems you don't like it when your poor argument tactics are exposed. I'm just the 'bad guy' because I call you on it.
Take care, Harv