Harv,

It appears as if you did not understand my last missive. We have apparently agreed upon one concept "The Universe" and I am now trying to obtain agreement on a second, different concept which I called "your mental image of the Universe". The issue here being that this second concept is "some figment of your imagination". The fundamental point not being whether it is a good representation or a bad representation but rather that you think it is at least a usable representation (a tool as you say). The only thing I am trying to convey is that these are two different concepts and I wish to speak about them separately.

I hope that clarifies it a bit -- Dick

• Sure, I can treat them as different concepts - harvey1 - February 13, 2002 - 16:03 UTC
  • unclear about the dangers of "double-booking" - quiet - February 13, 2002 - 16:21 UTC
    • I'm sorry - harvey1 - February 13, 2002 - 17:55 UTC
      • Maybe you're obtuse, too. - bladesinger - February 13, 2002 - 18:47 UTC
    • Double booking what??? - doctordick - February 13, 2002 - 19:08 UTC
      • y'all are "funnin'" me, right? Oops, that is an undefined term. - carefuluniverse - February 13, 2002 - 19:37 UTC
        • Natural selection - yanniru - February 13, 2002 - 21:49 UTC
      • About "double-booking" and definitions and going over my limit - carefuluniverse - February 14, 2002 - 04:34 UTC
        • Double-booking - dolphin - February 15, 2002 - 08:46 UTC
  • Concept #3! - doctordick - February 15, 2002 - 17:09 UTC
    • I prefer 'sense impressions' (nt) - harvey1 - February 15, 2002 - 20:03 UTC
      • When you "doubt", what "sense" for that info.? - dolphin - February 17, 2002 - 02:15 UTC