Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
First Things First..and Then I Often Go Take Naps

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by M.W.Pearson on February 4, 2002 21:42:01 UTC

Hi
Regarding the * IS * IS * IS * equation
If you define these as such, you CREATE
an effect because some of your liberal arts
and public policy will proceed from their influence. These words you mentioned
in the beginning of your post are EXPENSIVE
words in that they could be quiet wordy to fully
define even tersely and precisely.

What I meant about the language would also
operate at levels where definition was already settled but where proportion, context and location are relevant.

I think you're making fun of it a little, too.
This can happen when your verbal brain lobes have found the speed lane,.
You said something I found brilliant (but called "malarkey "(not!) about how
using information from the past has the effect of creating a wave structure in matter.
I hope you don't go off the deep end.
Remember how calm and happy you are sometimes?

Warm,
Mike

Follow Ups:

    Login to Post
    Additional Information
    Google
     
    Web www.astronomy.net
    DayNightLine
    About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
    Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2018 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
    Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
    "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
    are trademarks of John Huggins