You have to decide on a frame of reference. However, this factor is incorporated in physical theory.

I know where you are headed with this (absolute position, etc), but this is a philosophical issue which I already mentioned is tolerated within physical theories. There is nothing mathematically inconsistent as long as we apply our observations against the theory's terms and stated means on how to apply its predictions (e.g., classical theory is valid in a classical regime, quantum mechanics is valid in a quantum regime with a few exceptions in terms of certain classical sized objects that exhibit quantum behavior).

Warm regards, Harv

• I'm shocked - aurino - January 25, 2002 - 19:21 UTC
  • Huh? - harvey1 - January 25, 2002 - 19:44 UTC
    • I thought 2 + 2 = 5 - aurino - January 25, 2002 - 20:39 UTC
      • And now you - harvey1 - January 25, 2002 - 21:56 UTC
    • Harwey, wrong page. Aurino is indeed right here. - alexander - January 25, 2002 - 20:46 UTC
      • Not based on internet searches - harvey1 - January 25, 2002 - 21:17 UTC
        • Correction - harvey1 - January 25, 2002 - 22:01 UTC
          • Sorry Harv - aurino - January 28, 2002 - 20:49 UTC
            • You have no clue - harvey1 - January 28, 2002 - 21:19 UTC
              • I can be nasty too - aurino - January 28, 2002 - 22:00 UTC
                • Okay - harvey1 - January 28, 2002 - 22:22 UTC
                  • Correction - harvey1 - January 28, 2002 - 22:29 UTC
                    • You are not paying attention! - doctordick - January 29, 2002 - 21:04 UTC
                  • Is this 'professional' wrestling? - harvey1 - January 29, 2002 - 22:08 UTC
                    • Tagged out??? - aurino - January 30, 2002 - 13:59 UTC
                      • Oh please - harvey1 - January 30, 2002 - 15:06 UTC
                        • Just who the hell do you think you are? - aurino - January 30, 2002 - 16:15 UTC
                          • Typical response from you (nt) - harvey1 - January 30, 2002 - 17:10 UTC
                    • You have the wrong slant on this! - doctordick - January 30, 2002 - 14:07 UTC
                  • Simon says? - harvey1 - January 30, 2002 - 15:15 UTC
                  • Simon says? (messed up html, read this one) - harvey1 - January 30, 2002 - 15:17 UTC
                    • I am very sorry about that! - doctordick - January 31, 2002 - 16:35 UTC
                      • Don't be sorry, Dick - pmartin - January 31, 2002 - 21:52 UTC
                  • Are you trying to say that you are a sophisticated realist? - harvey1 - January 31, 2002 - 20:06 UTC
                  • Read this one, I just am no good at html - harvey1 - January 31, 2002 - 20:07 UTC
        • Google :) corrections - something - January 26, 2002 - 05:35 UTC
      • Regarding my Rice University reference - harvey1 - January 25, 2002 - 22:19 UTC
  • prove physics more pertinent to "god and science" than history - something - January 26, 2002 - 04:30 UTC
    • Some smiles about atheists and theists. - alexander - January 27, 2002 - 01:00 UTC