Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Left=right, Sure, And Up=down, Okay, But What=us?

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Luis Hamburgh on January 21, 2002 17:33:38 UTC

Our self-importance is so strong and fine-tuned that we see ourselves 'in the middle' of it all. There is a great deal of contemporary study in the psychology of math, and many folks think the patterns we see are just imaginary.

Can of worms, I know, especially to you, Alex, but I think it's an interesting argument.

I think you are as guilty of the anthro-centrist bias as the theists you decry. We simply are not that important, and the fact that math is not perfect shows that there might be a better explanation 'out there' somewhere.

In the Weinberg/Polkinghorne debate Harv and I have discussed lately, you can, for a fleeting moment, see (hear) it in both the theist and atheist position -- Godel's highlighting of math's imperfections leaves a lot of questions unanswered, and possibly unanswerable.

(Whether Al disagrees or not, I submit that last comment for the third party reader.)

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2018 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins