Can I suggest something for those folks who struggle to put forth coherent arguments (or those folks here who struggle with any kind of coherency altoghether)? Read some philosophical and scientific papers and at least try to think like a philosopher or scientist:

http://www.u.arizona.edu/~chalmers/people.html

http://xxx.lanl.gov/

If you catch yourself rambling (i.e., talking to yourself) or just talking to yourself, then it is time to regroup, maybe take some vacation time to rest your brain, and for some of you to actually seek psychological help (because oh my gosh you need it badly).

Harv

• I have read many of the lanl papers - yanniru - January 15, 2002 - 19:23 UTC
  • You're making a mistake - harvey1 - January 16, 2002 - 01:34 UTC
    • Sorry - yanniru - January 16, 2002 - 14:24 UTC
    • On your suggestion "Urging higher quality posts" - quiet - January 16, 2002 - 17:17 UTC
      • I just don't like you using multiple user names - harvey1 - January 16, 2002 - 17:38 UTC
        • you give them to yourself - quiet - January 16, 2002 - 20:16 UTC
          • irrelevent - harvey1 - January 16, 2002 - 21:43 UTC
            • On what authority or credential do you lecture me on this? - quiet - January 16, 2002 - 22:49 UTC
              • eh? - harvey1 - January 16, 2002 - 23:08 UTC
                • I get the last word - quiet - January 17, 2002 - 00:52 UTC
                  • Mike, this word indeed correctly describes you. - alexander - January 18, 2002 - 01:05 UTC