I just don't understand why you post under different names and even reply to yourself. It sends your credibility out the window and, I think, discourages a real interest in this forum by others who might normally be tempted to jump in. Why don't you just use one name and speak the way that you are capable? I really enjoy your comments sometimes and at other times am really turned off.

I mean this as a positive criticism and I hope that you don't see it any other way.

Btw, I partially agree with you on this particular issue.

Warmest regards, Harv

• If you are an education official, you're insulting me, right? - spazcon - January 12, 2002 - 20:25 UTC
  • See, now you have me all flustered - spazcon - January 12, 2002 - 20:28 UTC
    • I don't want you flustered - harvey1 - January 12, 2002 - 22:53 UTC
      • It is time to lead chemistry back to a stricter way of thinking" - spazcon - January 13, 2002 - 01:30 UTC
      • True story of Scopes Trial and Wm Jennings Brian - carefuluniverse - January 13, 2002 - 21:48 UTC
        • should read 'Bryan' and...is it the "true story?" - quiet - January 13, 2002 - 23:43 UTC
• Harvey, you are EXTREMELY right here. - alexander - January 15, 2002 - 00:08 UTC
  • Alexander tells what he learned for his "citizenship exam" (+) - carefuluniverse - January 15, 2002 - 01:08 UTC
    • Mike, as you can see I know USA history much better than you. - alexander - January 20, 2002 - 22:25 UTC
  • While his beloved Soviet Communists were doing this - carefuluniverse - January 15, 2002 - 03:25 UTC
    • Mike, did you forget the Great Depression era (1929-...)? - alexander - January 20, 2002 - 22:28 UTC
  • Are there forum rules for this kind of thing? (nt) - harvey1 - January 15, 2002 - 03:40 UTC
    • What kind of thing? - carefuluniverse - January 15, 2002 - 03:49 UTC
      • Michael, do you question that: - alexander - January 20, 2002 - 22:53 UTC