Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Re: Its The Other Way Round

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by The Fade on October 25, 1999 07:06:18 UTC

Let us not forget the fossilized remains of a large vessal i.e.( Noahs Ark) on Mount Ararat in Turkey and the stone mooring rings that a few miles below the site many miles from any large bodies of water that were carbon dated to be between 3200-2700 B.C. Also the high iron and zinc deposits in the middle east that cover only a 3 sq. mile area in the proposed place of Sodom & Gommarah. The minerals are consistant of common small meteorites. Hence the fire and brimestone.

To Bzrd: The Shroud of Turin was originally dated 14th Century A.D. A new "Cobalt" carbon dating system has determined to be much older. Around 2000 years. The blood stains have tracable DNA. The dust particals recovered on the shroud were instrumental in the first carbon test. Hence the error. But there was a 3rd test done on the bloodstain and the test concluded it much younger than the cloth. But pollen embedded in the stains said it was older. There is where the conterversy lies. That carbon dating is not full proof.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2020 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins