Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Much Too Simplistic

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Harvey on January 11, 2002 22:06:14 UTC


***Any existing object regardless its nature, composition, appearance, etc is labeled in math as 1, and lack of the object is labeled as 0. This is the ORIGIN of math and this is why math is correct in explaining universe - it simply translates fundamental property of any phenomena or object "to be or not to be"***

Al, where in the heck did you come up with this? The origin of math is based on abstract relationships seen in nature. These abstract relationships were since axiomatically constructed from the most reduced set of statements that could still produce the math in question. Contrary to what you say, reducing math to existence/non-existence, or object/no-object, or 1/0, or whatever else has never produced any significant branch of mathematics (not even Peano arithmetic can be produced with such a simple set of axioms such as 1 and 0).

***PLUS possible mathematical symmetries of environment (as well as of identical objects themselves) into sligtly more complex statements we call "energy conservation" or "inverse square" or "magnetic field" or "Pauli principle".***

You need broken symmetries, you need some defined terms, you need lots of concepts to construct the many of the laws within physics. You simply cannot reduce physics to 1/0. As I said, this makes a mockery of mathematics and physics.

Why is it that you reject a unifying principle to the universe? Einstein accepted it, what is your chief reason for avoiding this inevitable conclusion?

Warm regards, Harv

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins