Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Let Me Guess

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Paul R. Martin on January 8, 2002 17:00:30 UTC

Hi Harv,

Not being educated in philosophy, I don't know the officially accepted philosophical definition. But my understanding of the mathematical answer is that 'self-consistent' means that there exist no two contradictory true statements.

Self-consistency is an attribute of a collection of statements in some language. What it means for a statement to be true differs among contexts. In a philosophical context, I think truth means a correspondence between the statement and elements of reality. In mathematics, truth simply means that the statement conforms to some arbitrary criteria on which we have agreed.

The way I see it, science cares nothing about the truth of either philosophy or mathematics. But they don't hesitate to use the "truths" of mathematics to suggest how to make predictions of phenomena. In the cases where they are successful, the only claim of truth they make is that a particular prediction will have a particular probability of coming "true".

Those are just one old man's humble opinions.

Warm regards,


Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2023 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins