It has some properties resembling properties of ocean waves, and some resembling properties of a billiard ball. It has some other mathematical properties (entanglement of position and momentum, entanglement of spins of a double-energy photon) which "big" objects from our everyday life do not have.

So what? The phenomenon we call "photon" is still there.

Frankly, I do not understand what else you want to "see" in a photon? Properties of human? To "look" like a bullet at flight? Touch? Smell?Soul?

Should ALL mathematical objects in universe look either like a billiard ball or ocean wave?

• You're saying we must not demand to 'see' individual photons? - spazcon - January 8, 2002 - 04:07 UTC
  • Welcome to the "LIGHT" restaurant - dolphin - January 8, 2002 - 06:29 UTC
    • You're talking to an old dishwasher - spazcon - January 8, 2002 - 19:13 UTC
      • I once drove a forklift in student holidays (nt) - dolphin - January 11, 2002 - 09:25 UTC
    • Oh, I thought you were implying I was demanding service - quiet - January 11, 2002 - 19:40 UTC
  • Photon, proton, electron, graviton,etc. are mathematical objects - alexander - January 8, 2002 - 16:51 UTC
    • questions and answers need partners - spazcon - January 8, 2002 - 19:26 UTC
      • repost same (question and answers) - spazcon - January 8, 2002 - 19:29 UTC
  • Do photons move or are they just artifacts of the measuring proc - tronvig - April 6, 2002 - 23:51 UTC