Consider two events, you (detector, photomultiplier tube at B),
and them (light goes A to B via reflection), say.
By adding 1 unit of your clock to: their probability of their
event occuring in 1 unit of their clock, you get two clocks being
compared by their eventprobability.
With light, the shortestlightpaths turn up more often as more
of those can fit in an interval of spacetime.
You effectively treat your clock as having the same unit as their
clock. You get a sum of different densities of similarity
concentration; within all possible events occuring in a unit of
their clock. A number called an "amplitude". Then square that
number and you get probability of the event occuring in an
interval of two matching 1unit clocks.
Effectively you are using them to calibrate your clock to give a
spacetime or timespace or timetime (interchangeable concepts)
interval containing an actual real probability of their event
occuring.
Remember the classic diagram of a glass lense; with light rays
being bent more at the thin ends than at the thick center?
Apparantly you can regard the light as doing this even with no
glass lense there! But you don't see the bent paths as they take
longer, so there are more short paths per unit of your time than
long paths; you see the more frequent paths.
Put the glass lense there, and the thicker glass slows down those
short direct paths, and progressively as the glass thins it has
less slowing affect on all the paths.
So this makes all the paths take equal time to get to that little
spot; so the lighttime is focused onto that little space, making
it bright all at once.
Lenses then don't bend light; they synchronise spacetime; they
focus time on space; increasing selfreference for the light
there.
Light at the focus is kind of selfconscious. A hologram is even
more selfconscious light; conscious of the spacetime structure
it reflected off.
Lense focuses time; i.e. lighttime; i.e. light selfreference,
or light spacetime or light timespace); the elbowroom or time
space of light; the timespread of the light in space.
The timespread of light is the frequencyspread of light, the
amplitude of the frequency, the amplitude of the probability of
finding the light at a particular timespace.
The frequencynumber spread of light is a real number; the
'spread' is how that number is spread 'at right angles' (in a
different dimension) to it with 'how' being the real number of
how frequent the first frequency is in the other dimension.
So have a real number r + a real number r at right angles
(sq.rt 1); which means r + r x sq.rt 1 which is the definition
of a complex number. From there could esily go to hypercomplex
numbers etc.
A lense focuses the propertime of the light; we take propertime
as usual so we just say the lense focuses the light.
It appears that the 'vacuum' of space is actually a falsevacuum;
or 'vacuumsoup'. Apparantly there is a lot less 'vacuumsoup'
where the Earth is (a lot of it is frozenout as the Earth).
A mass near the Earth receives 'vacuumsoupons' from all about
the place giving information on how thin or thick the soup is.
If the soup is thin you get more of them; if thick you get less
as the thick soup slows them down.
But their pathways through the nearby Earth are diffracted by the
Earth as if the Earth were a "vaccumsoupon" lense. They speed
up through the Earth as there is little vacuumsoup in it (most
of it froze out into mass).
So the nearby mass gets less vacuumsoupons than usual coming
from the Earth per its local timeunit (local selfconsciousness
unit). So Earth shows up as a region of thin soup; so the mass is
attracted to this region of thinner soup where it has more real
vacuum room.
Just as there are these three types of events: an electron moves
from A to B; a photon moves from A to B; an electron emits or
absorbs a photon; there may be:
A vacuumsoupon (graviton?) moves from A to B; a photon,
electron, any boson or fermion moves from A to B; A vacuumsoup
on is absorbed or emitted by any fermion or boson.
So you can figure out "quantum mass dynamics"!
Including the forces, its all apparantly like weaving or
braiding: superstrings at rightangles to superstrings; warp and
weft; weak and strong forces in making a square knot; spin of the
thread; exchange of information; can explain later.
Deeper: its all about selfreference; the exchanges of
consciousness through all layers.
dolphin
