Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
A Note To Paul

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Alan on January 3, 2002 06:46:36 UTC

Thanks for your thoughtful response.

There have been dramatic developments in recent days regarding my understanding (I think) of what Dick has done. It started with noticing something about a bicycle wheel! I haven't revisited his paper since, but from what I recall
of it, and his various comments in discussion, I might even venture to say that Schrodinger's cat
just got out of the box!

The cool thing is: it's not crazy! The explanation
of things like the double slit experiment are
completely sensible- it just required 'doing one's
homework', it seems.

Sorry about the long post (99 numbered little paragraphs) of the new topic I posted; but I just wanted to get something in print.

I can try to condense to a handful of paragraphs the keys I think to Dick's paper.
Thanks for the info. about Penrose's more recent book.

-Alan

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2020 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins