Because, as anyone can see lookong at your posts, you only paste and copy ideas of other physicists.

Because you are uncapable of doing physics by yourself. And therefore, as often in such cases, you do not understand nature simply because your are INCOMPETENT of UNDERSTANDING nature which is all physical (=mathematical). Thus the root of your "no-math, please" philosophical interpretation of nature.

As to me, I do ACTUAL contribution into physics by doung research in physics and presenting results on conferences and in publications and monographs (not "internet publications" as many are "proud" of, but in peer reviewed professional journals).

So, WHO exactly is a PARROT here, huh?

I think, anyone can LOGICALLY DERIVE the answer.

Warm regards and merry x-mus.

• Well, we haven't seen anything original from you - harvey1 - December 23, 2001 - 17:19 UTC
• Sigh...I want to impress Alexander....he's so . . . dreamy - carefuluniverse - December 24, 2001 - 05:29 UTC