Message From 1995 Bio.net Re: Rigor In Human Population Biology - an Astronomy Net God & Science Forum Message

God & Science Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| God and Science \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Message From 1995 Bio.net Re: Rigor In Human Population Biology

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Michael W. Pearson on December 17, 2001 03:17:59 UTC

http://www.bio.net/hypermail/pop-bio/pop-bio.199504/0030.html

I, too, am tired of reading my own text.
By rigor: the most severe yet fair rooting out of logical errors

I do not deny God, but if when God explains something, I support the most rigorous criticism to ensure we understood correctly.

Science does not prove things true as math does.
Science criticizes and tests and tries to prove false. What is left standing is a beginning of knowledge, as many here realize.

Follow Ups:

The name of the book please - yanniru - December 17, 2001 - 15:48 UTC
- Andy Rooney's read the Koran....I haven't - spazcon - December 17, 2001 - 20:41 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins