Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
By The Very Definition Of The Word G_D.

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Mohammad Isa Mirsiam on December 15, 2001 21:47:31 UTC

My Dear Mike,
The G_D to which I refer is perfect. Even what you or I might see as imperfect is perfect for the purpose for which it exists. Even spelling errors are not errors in the presence of the G_D I refer to. All things are as they are supposed to be. It is we who are trying to attain a level of perfection. We admit that we can never reach the level of perfection of G_D because we say that we are not G_D. There can only be one G_D by the very definition of the word G_D.


Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2023 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins