Hi Alex,

There are some things we just don't know, Alex. One is the nature of consciousness. Another is the determinant of quantum events.

When science comes up with explanations for those things, I will probably sign right up to accept them and believe them. But until they do, I will form my own opinions based on my best guesses.

>>>Should we call molecules, atoms, electrons and especially photons progressively "conscious" then? The smaller - the more "conscious" (less predictable)?

• Paul,no driver is needed to"drive"uncertainty. Math does it all - alexander - December 14, 2001 - 15:45 UTC
  • Maybe yes; maybe no. - pmartin - December 15, 2001 - 03:16 UTC
    • When I ask where is higher dimension, I mean its signature. - alexander - December 16, 2001 - 17:51 UTC
      • It's called "TIME." Not hard to imagine... at least for me. - luis_hamburgh - December 16, 2001 - 22:24 UTC
        • Hey, I love Einstein's sctick, but Newton not a 'crock' - carefuluniverse - December 16, 2001 - 23:30 UTC
        • Luis, any equation to support your nut claim? - alexander - December 17, 2001 - 21:24 UTC
          • Don't have a stroke, old man -- I need you to stick around! - luis_hamburgh - December 18, 2001 - 23:01 UTC
            • What about the problem? - phillipmartin - December 19, 2001 - 19:08 UTC
      • You didn't comment on my answer - pmartin - December 17, 2001 - 06:44 UTC
        • Paul, cosmologists investigated it long ago. - alexander - December 17, 2001 - 21:43 UTC
          • Okay. Thanks Alex. (nt) - pmartin - December 18, 2001 - 01:31 UTC
          • Wait... wait... wait... Alex is retracting himself? - luis_hamburgh - December 18, 2001 - 23:07 UTC
            • Woah... - bladesinger - December 19, 2001 - 02:44 UTC