Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
The 2-d Approximation In Nature

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Richard Ruquist on December 10, 2001 15:32:18 UTC

According to Kip Thorne, it is just the opposite. As the number of dimensions increase, the effective mass density, such as to form black holes, increases.

I think we see evidence of that in nature. I have already suggested that spiral universes have that 2-d configuration in order to protects themselves from black holes. Pull the plug on a sink full of water and a vortex forms. Vortexs are essentially 2-d configurations as the variation in the radial direction is much greater than in the longitudinal direction.

The dynamic reason why 2-d or cylindrical configurations are more stable is because mass can obtain rotational energy in such a configuration. Rotational energy is a characteristic of 2-d, not 3-d or higher.

So by 2-d what I mean is that the properties of a system vary in the radial, and perhaps angular directions, but not in the longitudinal direction. Perhaps you are thinking that I meant that all mass in 3-d was to be projected on the 2-d plane.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2021 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins