Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
... I'm All Out Of Eye Catching Titles BASDFAGEAR FASDFADSFasdfadfkajsdkfaew2930=8429384 UEWPOADS;LFAJ3-9

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics
Posted by S.H. Le on October 15, 1999 03:10:05 UTC

Hello again. I thought I'd present yet another classic atheist argument.

-Theists assume a great deal in making this statement. How can one possibly assume that not only the universe had a first cause, but this single first cause was the cause of all things? ie. Everyone has a birthday, but it's illogical to say that everyone has a birthday that coincides on the same day. Secondly, lets just take the premise that the entire universe was the result of a single cause. How can one then assume that just because the universe had a first cause, that this cause need be all-powerful, all-good, and all-knowing (ie. Christian). The idea of a God could extend in the form of a higher power, or a force, etc. -How do you know the universe hasn't always existed? That's just as inconceivable as a God that's always existed. And how it possible for a being to create itself? That seems contrary to everything we know.

bye now.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2026 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins