I Think, Mass Can Esily Be Explained (and Without Higg Or Dark) - an Astronomy Net God & Science Forum Message

God & Science Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| God and Science \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

I Think, Mass Can Esily Be Explained (and Without Higg Or Dark)

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Alexander on December 6, 2001 18:35:54 UTC

It simply is relativistic property of standing wave. So, assuming that the universe consists ONLY of massless waves, you can derive mass using Lorentz transforms only.

Follow Ups:

Oh my gosh - harvey1 - December 6, 2001 - 19:14 UTC
- Harvey, standard model was DOA (dead on arrival). - alexander - December 6, 2001 - 19:26 UTC
  - So the predictions of the model are faulty? (nt) - harvey1 - December 6, 2001 - 19:59 UTC
    - Which predictions? It does not have much. - alexander - December 6, 2001 - 20:19 UTC
      - It has a number of tests - harvey1 - December 6, 2001 - 21:00 UTC
        
        Hmmm - luis_hamburgh - December 7, 2001 - 01:46 UTC
- gosh? - jisbond - December 6, 2001 - 20:48 UTC
  - It originally meant - harvey1 - December 6, 2001 - 21:03 UTC
    - Cartoon idiom - yanniru - December 7, 2001 - 01:46 UTC
Alex could be right - dolphin - December 7, 2001 - 09:44 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2025 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins