Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Well, Then You From Time To Time Get In Trouble.

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Alexander on December 5, 2001 00:40:22 UTC

As with the above paper which does not take into account that any movement of Earth versus a mirror (origin of time) will immediately make phase mismatch between advanced and retarded wave, so they will not be able to completely cancel each other. Also, fundamental assumption of the paper that T=0 is VERY questionable. False vacuum may have energy, and if so, time SHOULD exist before the Big Bang.

By the way, experiments also do not agree with the paper - light indeed falls onto black hole (and not much is seen in other directions), and neutrino experiments do not show anisotropy related to motion of Earth versus cosmic background frame.

There are some other inconsistencies in this paper.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins