Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
If Our Space Were "imbedded" Inverse Square Would Fail.

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Alexander on December 1, 2001 02:07:07 UTC

And it would depend then on the dimensionality of... well, of what? of "outer space"? is this "outer space" different from our "inner space"? Obviousely, it HAS to be different - othervise gravitons and photons would propagate in it exactly the same way they propagate in "inner" 3-D space, thus making gravity and electric field weakier in our "inner space". So, instead of inverse square fields would drop faster with the distance - depending on the total dimensionality of both "spaces".

So, we have no space similar to "inner space" beyond it.

And if the "outer space" is DIFFERENT than "inner space", well - can we call it space then? And if NOTHING we know can propagate in it (nor gravity, nor photons nor matter) - what evedence do we have then that there is ANYTHING "space-like" out there, beyond of our 3-D space at all?

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2023 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins